News
Company News: bubbles & beyond presents product update and outlook at nanotech 2012
bubbles & beyond, a technology company focusing on customized intelligent fluids®, today announced that the company will present its current product portfolio and business strategy for 2012 at the upcoming nanotech 2012 conference in Tokyo, Japan (Feb. 15-17).
Intelligent fluids® are customized phase fluids, which are primarily designed for cleaning, separating and protecting surfaces. They significantly outperform competitive products in terms of efficiency and eco-friendliness. The technology platform is suitable for functional cosmetics, healthcare and industrial cleaning applications (construction, microelectronics, industrial solutions, print rolls, etc.). Products and processes based on intelligent fluids® are free from risky or dangerous substances and offer completely new application areas, significantly enhanced product characteristics and considerable process optimization in industrial settings.
In 2011, bubbles & beyond has reached major milestones, including the launch of its enpurex® cleansing product line for the printing industry, an important global distribution agreement with Rolf Meyer GmbH for the enpurex® line, and a development collaboration with JNC-CHISSO to create advanced cleansing solutions for the microelectronics sector. In addition, bubbles & beyond has established an advisory board of seasoned industry experts.
Company News: Amgen to Acquire Micromet
Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN) and Micromet, Inc. (NASDAQ: MITI) today announced that the companies have entered into a definitive merger agreement under which Amgen will acquire Micromet, a biotechnology company founded inGermany with its research and development (R&D) center in Munich and headquarters in Rockville, Md., for $11 per share in cash. The transaction, which values Micromet at approximately $1.16 billion, was unanimously approved by both the Amgen and Micromet Boards of Directors.
The acquisition includes blinatumomab, a Bispecific T cell Engager (BiTE) antibody in Phase 2 clinical development for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blinatumomab is also in clinical development for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), and could have applications in other hematologic malignancies.
Read more here.
akampion Meets…. Victoria English, Co-Founder and Editor of MedNous
In 2006, long-time journalists Victoria English and William Ellington decided to quit their jobs and to establish their own publication, the biomedical trade journal MedNous (pronounced Med-Nows). A year later, in September 2007, the first issue appeared alongside with the website www.mednous.com.
akampion: Why did you establish MedNous?
Victoria English: Both of us thought Europe’s very innovative life science industry needed better communication. Back then, everyone was thinking in clusters and areas, and we felt by connecting the dots we could support the industry in its efforts to increase efficiency. Second, at that time the European Commission and the EMEA were very worried about the decreasing productivity of the biopharmaceutical industry, and Europe developed the Innovative Medicines Initiative, similar to the FDA’s Critical Path policy. This, too, called for better collaboration, and we wanted to capture this shift in official politics to encourage collaboration and translation of discoveries into products. Third, after working for many years in big corporations such as Reuters, DowJones, McGraw Hill and Informa, I thought it is time to start my own company.
akampion: What kind of preparations were necessary?
V. E.: After quitting our jobs we spent about 12 months to set up a website and a database, before we the first issue went out. During that time, we looked at every single bio-cluster in Europe and its member companies. Our database entries are updated ever since on a regular basis.
akampion: What exactly is MedNous focusing on?
V. E.: Originally, we focused on genetic therapy and stem cell therapy as we thought these were the most innovative areas and because no one else was writing about it. But it soon became obvious that these technologies were not that advanced as we thought, so we added other areas as well. Now we report about all companies developing products that will be regulated under the centralized procedure of the EMEA, plus projects validated by either venture capital funding or pharma collaborations. In fact, some companies emerge on our radar screen only after a huge financing.
akampion: How do you work?
V. E.: We do interviews on the phone, but for bigger stories we travel to the companies to get a first-hand impression. We also visit conferences. We are very interested in data, of course, but our key interest is answering questions like “what is the management like?”, “what is their strategy?”, “what have been their failures and successes?”
akampion: What does it take to fund a publication?
V. E.: You need to have capital, an interest in marketing and the business side. Luckily, we were able to finance the start ourselves, and now the company is generating revenues from subscriptions. And of course you need to adapt your technology all the time to spread the word. As an example, RSS feeds increasingly lost their importance – now it is all about Twitter and other social networks.
akampion: You still stick to a publication printed on paper. Why is that?
V. E.: Simply because we want to have an impact by providing a product that allows for a comprehensive view, which we think is valuable to the industry. For this reason we have also chosen not to break it down to single articles that can be purchased. We do, however, provide a PDF version of each issue.
akampion: You established an editorial board for MedNous. Why?
V. E.: We want to add some depth to our editorial coverage. So we take advice from the board on topics to write about, and we also ask members of the board to review our interviews before publication. Neither William nor I are scientists. We keep to the time-honored journalistic practice of maintaining independence from our sources, e. g, the people we interview do not vet articles about themselves. Yet we recognize that we need advice on some of the technical aspects. Members of the editorial board provide this advice. They are active and very valuable contributors.
akampion: How many people are working at MedNous?
V. E.: Currently we employ six people, including a contributing editor, web and production editors, proofreaders, etc.
akampion: What is your take on the European sector right now?
V. E.: In my view, Europe has a big competitive advantage over the US: the European healthcare systems may be diverse, but all are built on some kind of reimbursement and this guarantees a much closer look at the patient benefits of new medicines. So in this respect, feedback is much better and this will lead to products better serving the need of patients.
akampion: Do you still have time to do other things?
V.E.: Running a publication is a job that needs your attention most of your days, including the weekends. But I do enjoy visiting the British Library to read and I take modern dance and tap dance classes. In addition, I also help manage a number of community organizations including our local community center where I am a trustee.
Food for Thought: BASF Plant Sciences Moving to the US
NGOs such as Greenpeace and BUND as well as Green politicians such as Rhineland-Palatinate State Minister Ulrike Hoefken, responsible for the environment, agriculture, food, viniculture and forests, hailed the recent decision by German chemical company BASF to move its plant science activities from Limburgerhof, Rhineland-Palatinate/Germany, to Raleigh, North Carolina.
BASF said the decision was made because of “lack of acceptance for this technology in many parts of Europe”, adding it did “not make business sense to continue investing in products exclusively for cultivation in this market.” As a result, development and commercialization of all products targeted solely at cultivation in the European market will be halted.
In response to this decision, Minister Hoefken said that “the research by BASF has not been constrained by any means”, adding the decision was caused by lack of success of genetically engineered products in cultivation and marketing. She also stated, “agrogenetic engineering is not able to comply with statutory provisions. Agrogenetic engineering is no worthwhile future technology.”
Hoefken, however, did not say that politicians have bestowed great care in the past to make regulatory provisions as impractical as possible for companies developing genetically engineered plants. As examples, companies and farmers planting genetically engineered crops are liable for compensation if conventional crops (or honey) in the vicinity are “contaminated” with genes by the genetically engineered variants. There is no threshold level defined so that based on today’s PCR capabilities it is very easy to find them, and the “contaminated” harvest is treated and destroyed as if polluted with plutonium. In addition, fields tilled with genetically engineered plants have to be disclosed in a public registry – an invitation for self-proclaimed “field liberators” which vandalize the fields in a well-organized manner on a regular basis, flogging security guards and destroying plants and machinery. A list of these destructions compiled by the Federation of German Plant Breeders (BPI) can be found here. Politics has done nothing to stop this practice.
While BASF will slash 140 positions in Europe, it will keep and strengthen its research facilities at metanomics in Berlin/Germany and CropDesign in Ghent/Belgium. “Although the conditions for cultivation of genetically modified crops in Europe are unfavorable, there are world-class research institutes and universities in both Berlin and Ghent,” said Dr. Peter Eckes, President of BASF Plant Science. “We have excellent scientists and facilities there and at our research sites in North America.” BASF therefore will continue its research at these locations. metanomics profiles metabolites, e.g. for gene discovery, mechanism-of-action studies, biomarker discovery and other applications. Metabolite profiling for healthcare customers in industry and academia are offered by BASF Group company metanomics health, also based in Berlin.
Already in 2004, Bayer and Syngenta had stopped their activities to test genetically modified plants in Germany. The only company still pursuing such tests in Germany is KWS Saat AG .
